Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262859AbUKXUkL (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Nov 2004 15:40:11 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262857AbUKXUkK (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Nov 2004 15:40:10 -0500 Received: from viper.oldcity.dca.net ([216.158.38.4]:42418 "HELO viper.oldcity.dca.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S262849AbUKXUiS (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Nov 2004 15:38:18 -0500 Subject: Re: Isolating two network processes on same machine From: Lee Revell To: linux-os@analogic.com Cc: Ole Laursen , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, d507a@cs.aau.dk In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2004 11:38:16 -0500 Message-Id: <1101314296.1761.18.camel@krustophenia.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 614 Lines: 16 On Wed, 2004-11-24 at 11:23 -0500, linux-os wrote: > I was going to say, set the netmask small enough so that both > machines are on different networks and set default routes to > your gateway.... But there is a bug somewhere that doesn't > allow a netmask of anything but 0 in the last byte. > Really? That would be a horrible bug. How about some references? Lee - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/