Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262989AbUKYACv (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Nov 2004 19:02:51 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262943AbUKYAAX (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Nov 2004 19:00:23 -0500 Received: from fsmlabs.com ([168.103.115.128]:33203 "EHLO fsmlabs.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263001AbUKXXz1 (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Nov 2004 18:55:27 -0500 Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2004 14:55:50 -0700 (MST) From: Zwane Mwaikambo To: Nigel Cunningham cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: Suspend 2 merge: 22/51: Suspend2 lowlevel code. In-Reply-To: <1101331206.3895.40.camel@desktop.cunninghams> Message-ID: References: <1101292194.5805.180.camel@desktop.cunninghams> <1101296166.5805.279.camel@desktop.cunninghams> <1101331206.3895.40.camel@desktop.cunninghams> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 985 Lines: 19 On Thu, 25 Nov 2004, Nigel Cunningham wrote: > That's roughly what we're doing now, apart from the offlining/onlining. > I had considered trying to take better advantage of SMP support (perhaps > run a decompression thread on one CPU and the writer on the other, eg), > so we might want to apply this just to the region immediately around the > atomic copy/restore. That makes me wonder, though, what the advantage is > to switching to using the hotplug functionality - is it x86 only, or > more cross platform? (If more cross platform, that might possibly be an > advantage over the current code). It's cross platform and removes the requirement for patches like; Subject: Suspend 2 merge: 13/51: Disable highmem tlb flush for copyback. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/