Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262500AbUKZTrO (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Nov 2004 14:47:14 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262408AbUKZTrM (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Nov 2004 14:47:12 -0500 Received: from zeus.kernel.org ([204.152.189.113]:4291 "EHLO zeus.kernel.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262500AbUKZT2u (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Nov 2004 14:28:50 -0500 Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2004 23:08:17 +0100 (MET) From: Esben Nielsen To: Ingo Molnar Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Priority Inheritance Test (Real-Time Preemption) In-Reply-To: <20041125165829.GA24121@elte.hu> Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-DAIMI-Spam-Score: -2.82 () ALL_TRUSTED Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 848 Lines: 28 On Thu, 25 Nov 2004, Ingo Molnar wrote: > [...] > > yeah, i agree that this has to be further investigated. What type of box > did you test it on - UP or SMP? (SMP scheduling of RT tasks only got > fully correct in the very latest -31-7 kernel.) > I am running on -31-7 kernel now - it takes quite some time to run with the runall.sh script with 100000 samples per point so I don't have full data yet. But the bounds look like depth observed bound theoretical 1 1 ms 1 ms 2 3 ms 2 ms :-( the rest of the list will follow tomorrow... > Ingo > Esben - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/