Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263403AbUKZW2z (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Nov 2004 17:28:55 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263391AbUKZWKV (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Nov 2004 17:10:21 -0500 Received: from out010pub.verizon.net ([206.46.170.133]:51697 "EHLO out010.verizon.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264028AbUKZV7f (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Nov 2004 16:59:35 -0500 From: Gene Heskett Reply-To: gene.heskett@verizon.net Organization: Organization: None, detectable by casual observers To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: network problems? Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2004 16:59:28 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.7 References: <200411250006.15248.gene.heskett@verizon.net> In-Reply-To: <200411250006.15248.gene.heskett@verizon.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200411261659.28130.gene.heskett@verizon.net> X-Authentication-Info: Submitted using SMTP AUTH at out010.verizon.net from [151.205.10.220] at Fri, 26 Nov 2004 15:59:27 -0600 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 4686 Lines: 105 On Thursday 25 November 2004 00:06, Gene Heskett wrote: It looks as if verizon has at least attempted to fix the broken server, I've rx'd about 275 messages from this list, mostly from the 24th with a few of yesterdays, in the last hour. So there is at least hope here in MudVille. :-) >Greetings; > >I've noticed all day that I cannot get to weather.com, and I've only >rx'd 3 messages from the list since about 14:00 my time, midnight >now. Not even my own posts are coming back. > >Ingo Molnar, if you are copying the mail, that >2.6.10-rc2-mm3-V0.7.31-3 kernel I built this morning is still up, no >problems so far. Sweet is the best description I can give it right >now. I should probably correct this a wee bit. I don't have jack or its cousins installed, but have been using tvtime as a stress tester of sorts. Now running the 31-7 version, but 31-3 gave similar results. Everything seems clean, and a bit snappier than usual and even tvtime, which runs with a nice of -19 gives me a much smoother pix, less stuttering than before, to the point where I at first thought it was indeed keeping up. But that, from my logs, appears not to be the case as I now have about a 60 megabyte messages file, which generally speaking looks normal till I fire up tvtime. At that point the logs start filling up with messages from the debugging options like this, which is the last screenfull of a 1 minute run that added a meg or so to the file: Nov 26 16:44:00 coyote kernel: `IRQ 8'[846] is being piggy. need_resched=0, cpu=0 Nov 26 16:44:00 coyote kernel: Read missed before next interrupt Nov 26 16:44:00 coyote kernel: wow! That was a 22 millisec bump Nov 26 16:44:00 coyote kernel: `IRQ 8'[846] is being piggy. need_resched=0, cpu=0 Nov 26 16:44:00 coyote kernel: Read missed before next interrupt Nov 26 16:44:00 coyote kernel: wow! That was a 22 millisec bump Nov 26 16:44:00 coyote kernel: `IRQ 8'[846] is being piggy. need_resched=0, cpu=0 Nov 26 16:44:00 coyote kernel: Read missed before next interrupt Nov 26 16:44:00 coyote kernel: wow! That was a 22 millisec bump Nov 26 16:44:00 coyote kernel: `IRQ 8'[846] is being piggy. need_resched=0, cpu=0 Nov 26 16:44:00 coyote kernel: Read missed before next interrupt Nov 26 16:44:00 coyote kernel: wow! That was a 22 millisec bump Nov 26 16:44:00 coyote kernel: `IRQ 8'[846] is being piggy. need_resched=0, cpu=0 Nov 26 16:44:00 coyote kernel: Read missed before next interrupt Nov 26 16:44:00 coyote kernel: Nov 26 16:44:00 coyote kernel: rtc latency histogram of {tvtime/24631, 22440 samples}: Nov 26 16:44:00 coyote kernel: 4 6 Nov 26 16:44:00 coyote kernel: 5 2850 Nov 26 16:44:00 coyote kernel: 6 8330 Nov 26 16:44:00 coyote kernel: 7 3399 Nov 26 16:44:00 coyote kernel: 8 1097 Nov 26 16:44:00 coyote kernel: 9 723 Nov 26 16:44:00 coyote kernel: 10 807 Nov 26 16:44:00 coyote kernel: 11 761 Nov 26 16:44:00 coyote kernel: 12 585 Nov 26 16:44:00 coyote kernel: 13 665 Nov 26 16:44:00 coyote kernel: 14 750 Nov 26 16:44:00 coyote kernel: 15 391 Nov 26 16:44:00 coyote kernel: 16 169 Nov 26 16:44:00 coyote kernel: 17 60 Nov 26 16:44:00 coyote kernel: 18 49 Nov 26 16:44:00 coyote kernel: 19 32 Nov 26 16:44:00 coyote kernel: 20 18 Nov 26 16:44:00 coyote kernel: 21 7 Nov 26 16:44:00 coyote kernel: 22 7 Nov 26 16:44:00 coyote kernel: 23 2 Nov 26 16:44:01 coyote kernel: 26 2 Nov 26 16:44:01 coyote kernel: 27 1 Nov 26 16:44:01 coyote kernel: 9999 1729 --------------------------------- Is there some option I can set or disable so it only prints the ending summary to the log? Also, this is with the anticipatory scheduler, cfq is noticably better as maintaining the interactivity feel of the system, but doesn't seem to effect the above reporting to the log one way or the other.. However, using cfq doubles the runtime for the nightly amanda session. Amanda doesn't appear to mind. All told, Ingo, I'm very impressed, this is as sweet as this system has ever run! Now if I could just get verizon to throw enough iron into their mailservers so they will catchup and go realtime again. -- Cheers, Gene "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order." -Ed Howdershelt (Author) 99.29% setiathome rank, not too shabby for a WV hillbilly Yahoo.com attorneys please note, additions to this message by Gene Heskett are: Copyright 2004 by Maurice Eugene Heskett, all rights reserved. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/