Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 27 Apr 2001 11:00:03 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 27 Apr 2001 10:59:54 -0400 Received: from cisco7500-mainGW.gts.cz ([194.213.32.131]:17156 "EHLO bug.ucw.cz") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 27 Apr 2001 10:59:50 -0400 Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2001 15:16:15 +0000 From: Pavel Machek To: "Eric S. Raymond" , Alexander Viro , "Albert D. Cahalan" , CML2 , kbuild-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: Request for comment -- a better attribution system Message-ID: <20010425151614.A45@(none)> In-Reply-To: <200104212023.f3LKN7P188973@saturn.cs.uml.edu> <20010421164659.A4704@thyrsus.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i In-Reply-To: <20010421164659.A4704@thyrsus.com>; from esr@thyrsus.com on Sat, Apr 21, 2001 at 04:46:59PM -0400 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi! > > The real problem is that large part of the kernel has no permanent > > maintainers. Which makes the whole (overdesigned) idea completely moot. > > One of the problems this - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/