Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261381AbUK1AzO (ORCPT ); Sat, 27 Nov 2004 19:55:14 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261382AbUK1AzO (ORCPT ); Sat, 27 Nov 2004 19:55:14 -0500 Received: from colin2.muc.de ([193.149.48.15]:14608 "HELO colin2.muc.de") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S261381AbUK1AzL (ORCPT ); Sat, 27 Nov 2004 19:55:11 -0500 Message-ID: <20041128005506.96454.qmail@colin2.muc.de> From: ak@muc.de Date: 28 Nov 2004 01:55:06 +0100 To: Arnd Bergmann cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC] Splitting kernel headers and deprecating __KERNEL__ In-Reply-To: <35kb6-46Q-25@gated-at.bofh.it> References: <34Xo6-2P0-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <35i9f-2vZ-25@gated-at.bofh.it> <35iLS-2Uo-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <35kb6-46Q-25@gated-at.bofh.it> Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2004 01:55:06 +0100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 863 Lines: 18 > I think we can get rid of this hack when we move to split kernel headers. > parisc, s390 and mips already have combined headers, and it should not be > too hard to combine the user ABI headers for sparc, ppc and x86_64 as well, > without having to merge the complete architecture and kernel header trees > for them. Please don't do that. x86_64 are not really synchronized in development (unlike s390/s390x) and I don't really want too coordinate too much with the i386 people when I change something in asm. There are also significant differences in some places already. Keep it separate is imho far better. -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/