Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261605AbUK1X4Z (ORCPT ); Sun, 28 Nov 2004 18:56:25 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261606AbUK1X4Z (ORCPT ); Sun, 28 Nov 2004 18:56:25 -0500 Received: from gprs214-185.eurotel.cz ([160.218.214.185]:26501 "EHLO amd.ucw.cz") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261605AbUK1X4V (ORCPT ); Sun, 28 Nov 2004 18:56:21 -0500 Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 00:55:30 +0100 From: Pavel Machek To: Nigel Cunningham Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Linux Kernel Mailing List , hugang@soulinfo.com, Andrew Morton Subject: Re: Suspend 2 merge Message-ID: <20041128235530.GB2856@elf.ucw.cz> References: <20041124132839.GA13145@infradead.org> <1101329104.3425.40.camel@desktop.cunninghams> <20041125192016.GA1302@elf.ucw.cz> <1101422088.27250.93.camel@desktop.cunninghams> <20041125232200.GG2711@elf.ucw.cz> <1101426416.27250.147.camel@desktop.cunninghams> <20041126003944.GR2711@elf.ucw.cz> <1101455756.4343.106.camel@desktop.cunninghams> <20041126123847.GD1028@elf.ucw.cz> <1101680972.4343.300.camel@desktop.cunninghams> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1101680972.4343.300.camel@desktop.cunninghams> X-Warning: Reading this can be dangerous to your mental health. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040722i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1659 Lines: 37 Hi! > > My machine suspends in 7 seconds, and that's swsusp1. According to > > your numbers, suspend2 should suspend it in 1 second and LZE > > compressed should be .5 second. > > Seven seconds? How much memory is in use when you start, and how much is > actually written to disk? If you're starting with 1GB of RAM in use, > I'll sit up and listen, but I suspect you're talking about something > closer to 20MB and init S :> It was on .5GB machine, with X running, IIRC. Specify how should I load the system and I'll try it here. swsusp1 got some speedups with O(n^2) killing (not yet merged). > These discussions are getting really unreasonable. "I don't want that > feature, therefore it shouldn't be merged" isn't a valid argument. > Neither is "Well, I can suspend in seven seconds with hardly any memory > in use." If you just don't want suspend2 in the kernel, come out and say > it. Ok, "I do not want suspend2 in kernel". Not what you'd call suspend2, anyway. I thought that stripping down suspend2 then merging it is reasonable way to go, but now it seems to me that enhancing swsusp1 is easier way to go. At least I'll be able to do it incrementally. I'm sorry about all the confusion, and you can still get that jpeg for "put pavel into doom3". Pavel -- People were complaining that M$ turns users into beta-testers... ...jr ghea gurz vagb qrirybcref, naq gurl frrz gb yvxr vg gung jnl! - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/