Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261656AbUK2LPH (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Nov 2004 06:15:07 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261660AbUK2LMo (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Nov 2004 06:12:44 -0500 Received: from viking.sophos.com ([194.203.134.132]:8965 "EHLO viking.sophos.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261656AbUK2LLK (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Nov 2004 06:11:10 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MIMETrack: S/MIME Sign by Notes Client on Tvrtko Ursulin/Dev/UK/Sophos(Release 5.0.12 |February 13, 2003) at 29/11/2004 11:10:54, Serialize by Notes Client on Tvrtko Ursulin/Dev/UK/Sophos(Release 5.0.12 |February 13, 2003) at 29/11/2004 11:10:54, Serialize complete at 29/11/2004 11:10:54, S/MIME Sign failed at 29/11/2004 11:10:54: The cryptographic key was not found, S/MIME Sign by Notes Client on Tvrtko Ursulin/Dev/UK/Sophos(Release 5.0.12 |February 13, 2003) at 29/11/2004 11:11:02, Serialize by Notes Client on Tvrtko Ursulin/Dev/UK/Sophos(Release 5.0.12 |February 13, 2003) at 29/11/2004 11:11:02, Serialize complete at 29/11/2004 11:11:02, S/MIME Sign failed at 29/11/2004 11:11:02: The cryptographic key was not found, Serialize by Router on Mercury/Servers/Sophos(Release 6.5.2|June 01, 2004) at 29/11/2004 11:11:05, Serialize complete at 29/11/2004 11:11:05 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: torvalds@osdl.org, akpm@osdl.org, marcelo.tosatti@cyclades.com Subject: [BUG ?] smbfs open always succeeds X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 5.0.12 February 13, 2003 Message-ID: From: tvrtko.ursulin@sophos.com Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 11:11:02 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 804 Lines: 22 Hello, I posted a possible bug report to the maintainer about 10 days ago but with no response, therefore here it goes again. As far a I can tell it is common for both 2.4 and 2.6. Sorry if this is not a bug but some hidden functionality! --- snippet from the original mail to the maintainer --- Looking at linux-2.6.9/fs/smbfs/file.c line 365 (end of the smb_file_open function). Shouldn't it be "return result;" instead of "return 0;" ? I've been tracing some strange behaviour and this fixed it for me. But I am far away from being an expert. :) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/