Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261437AbUK2Rpn (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Nov 2004 12:45:43 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261440AbUK2Rpn (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Nov 2004 12:45:43 -0500 Received: from pool-141-154-235-89.bos.east.verizon.net ([141.154.235.89]:2564 "EHLO ccure.user-mode-linux.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261437AbUK2Rpk (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Nov 2004 12:45:40 -0500 Message-Id: <200411292000.iATK0qOF004026@ccure.user-mode-linux.org> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.4 06/23/2000 with nmh-1.1-RC1 To: grendel@caudium.net cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: user- vs kernel-level resource sandbox for Linux? In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 29 Nov 2004 11:19:19 +0100." <20041129101919.GB9419@beowulf.thanes.org> References: <20041129101919.GB9419@beowulf.thanes.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 15:00:52 -0500 From: Jeff Dike Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 453 Lines: 13 grendel@caudium.net said: > I would appreciate any pointers to the userland solutions for that > problem (if any exist) before I resort to Xen/UML. UML would be exactly what you're looking for. Jeff - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/