Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 27 Apr 2001 17:44:40 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 27 Apr 2001 17:44:31 -0400 Received: from perninha.conectiva.com.br ([200.250.58.156]:41735 "HELO perninha.conectiva.com.br") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Fri, 27 Apr 2001 17:44:16 -0400 Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2001 18:44:11 -0300 (BRST) From: Rik van Riel X-X-Sender: To: LA Walsh Cc: Rogier Wolff , Xavier Bestel , Goswin Brederlow , William T Wilson , , Subject: Re: 2.4 and 2GB swap partition limit In-Reply-To: <3AE9DC22.597D94F5@sgi.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 27 Apr 2001, LA Walsh wrote: > An interesting option (though with less-than-stellar performance > characteristics) would be a dynamically expanding swapfile. If you're > going to be hit with swap penalties, it may be useful to not have to > pre-reserve something you only hit once in a great while. This makes amazingly little sense since you'd still need to pre-reserve the disk space the swapfile grows into. A dynamically growing swap file can only save you if you reserve enough free space on your filesystem for the thing to grow... regards, Rik -- Linux MM bugzilla: http://linux-mm.org/bugzilla.shtml Virtual memory is like a game you can't win; However, without VM there's truly nothing to lose... http://www.surriel.com/ http://www.conectiva.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/