From: Peter Chubb <peter@chubb.wattle.id.au>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <16811.40687.892939.304185@wombat.chubb.wattle.id.au>
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2004 09:13:03 +1100
To: Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>
Cc: grendel@caudium.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: user- vs kernel-level resource sandbox for Linux? 
In-Reply-To: <200411292000.iATK0qOF004026@ccure.user-mode-linux.org>
References: <20041129101919.GB9419@beowulf.thanes.org>
	<200411292000.iATK0qOF004026@ccure.user-mode-linux.org>
Comments: Hyperbole mail buttons accepted, v04.18.
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 854
Lines: 25

>>>>> "Jeff" == Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com> writes:

Jeff> grendel@caudium.net said:
>> I would appreciate any pointers to the userland solutions for that
>> problem (if any exist) before I resort to Xen/UML.

Jeff> UML would be exactly what you're looking for.

Jeff> 				Jeff

apart from the performance hit :-(

There have been a number of different approaches proposed in the past
to limit real memory usage per-process; search for RSS limit in the
archives.

--
Dr Peter Chubb  http://www.gelato.unsw.edu.au  peterc AT gelato.unsw.edu.au
The technical we do immediately,  the political takes *forever*

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/