Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261887AbUK3AbY (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Nov 2004 19:31:24 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261890AbUK3AbX (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Nov 2004 19:31:23 -0500 Received: from sv1.valinux.co.jp ([210.128.90.2]:2210 "EHLO sv1.valinux.co.jp") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261887AbUK3AbF (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Nov 2004 19:31:05 -0500 Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2004 09:31:03 +0900 From: Itsuro Oda To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [lkdump-develop] Re: [ANNOUNCE 0/7] Diskdump 1.0 Release Message-Id: <20041130083116.3D92.ODA@valinux.co.jp> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.10.04 [ja] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1191 Lines: 33 Hi, I am a developer of an yet another crash dump (mkdump). I'd like to know conditions which cause taking dump fail. It is helpful to share those informations for dump developers. I have three major concerns about taking dump. * interrupt disable taking dump should be run under interrput disable. diskdump is aware of that. How about kexec based dump ? * avoid deadlock taking dump should not get any locks to avoid deadlock. (?) I think there are many posibility of deadlock in the kexec based dump (from crash occur to initiate the new kernel). (mkdump does not meet neither yet. :-p) * be sure to get the other CPUs' register value How are the other CPUs' regsiter value get and how are the other CPUs stoped ? (of course the goal of mkdump is to solve these points although not implemented yet :-) Any other points to be consider ? Comments and suggestions are welcome. Thank you. -- Itsuro ODA - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/