Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262238AbUK3SKp (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Nov 2004 13:10:45 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262233AbUK3SGg (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Nov 2004 13:06:36 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:7868 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262238AbUK3SEb (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Nov 2004 13:04:31 -0500 Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2004 13:04:22 -0500 (EST) From: Rik van Riel X-X-Sender: riel@chimarrao.boston.redhat.com To: Ian Pratt cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Steven.Hand@cl.cam.ac.uk, Christian.Limpach@cl.cam.ac.uk, Keir.Fraser@cl.cam.ac.uk, akpm@osdl.org Subject: Re: Xen VMM patch set - take 3 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 817 Lines: 22 On Tue, 30 Nov 2004, Ian Pratt wrote: > We didn't get much feedback from take 2, so hopefully we're > converging on something that's acceptable. I see it's all been cleaned up, it all looks good to me. > The only major difference between this set and the previous is the way > we handle the /dev/mem changes. I think the new approach is rather > cleaner. Yay. -- "Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place. Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you are, by definition, not smart enough to debug it." - Brian W. Kernighan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/