Message-ID: <41D83297.7030605@tuleriit.ee>
Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 19:42:47 +0200
From: Indrek Kruusa <indrek.kruusa@tuleriit.ee>
Reply-To: indrek.kruusa@tuleriit.ee
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (X11/20040923)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: bert hubert <ahu@ds9a.nl>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Question: advancements in proven concepts
References: <41D7E3EF.8000700@tuleriit.ee> <20050102130304.GA27255@outpost.ds9a.nl>
In-Reply-To: <20050102130304.GA27255@outpost.ds9a.nl>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1344
Lines: 40

bert hubert wrote:

>On Sun, Jan 02, 2005 at 02:07:11PM +0200, Indrek Kruusa wrote:
>  
>
>LT> It would have been nice if Intel had added a
>LT> "single-step" bit to %db7, and then just or'ed in the values of TF and the
>LT> new flag when deciding to single-step.
>  
>
>>Maybe this idea have been said out just for fun  (btw, I have one book 
>>which have similar title :) ) but why not collect such things together? 
>>    
>>
>
>Rest assured that this list has subscribers @ all relevant processor
>manufacturers. But there is nothing formal, it is not the linux way to set
>up committees or whatever, except perhaps for OSDL.
>
>  
>

Of course by using this list you can reach all the knowledge which 
kernel community has. But maybe some essential conclusions should be 
made more visible and more public? This is not needed for kernel 
developers itselves but for example for students or IT project leaders 
or investors. But okay, I got answer from you.

And thanks for god that this have never happened: "Linux kernel 
developers summit 2004", 23.-28. december, Sri Lanka


regards,
Indrek

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/