Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 28 Apr 2001 09:31:18 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 28 Apr 2001 09:31:08 -0400 Received: from dial249.pm3abing3.abingdonpm.naxs.com ([216.98.75.249]:33296 "EHLO ani.animx.eu.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 28 Apr 2001 09:30:54 -0400 Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2001 09:37:22 -0400 From: Wakko Warner To: Rogier Wolff Cc: Xavier Bestel , Goswin Brederlow , William T Wilson , Matt_Domsch@Dell.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.4 and 2GB swap partition limit Message-ID: <20010428093722.A17218@animx.eu.org> In-Reply-To: <20010427182228.D9778@animx.eu.org> <200104281317.PAA04172@cave.bitwizard.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.3i In-Reply-To: <200104281317.PAA04172@cave.bitwizard.nl>; from Rogier Wolff on Sat, Apr 28, 2001 at 03:17:01PM +0200 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > So you've spent almost $200 for RAM, and refuse to spend $4 for 1Gb of > swap space. Fine with me. I put this much ram into the system to keep from having swap. I still say swap=2x ram is a stupid idea. I fail to see the logic in that. Disk is much much slower than ram and if you're writing all ram to disk that's also slow. I have a machine with 256mb of ram and no disk. It runs just fine w/o swap. Only reason I even had swap here is if I ran something that used up all my memory and it has happened. Since when has linux started to be like windows "our way or no way"? -- Lab tests show that use of micro$oft causes cancer in lab animals - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/