Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261343AbVABXVG (ORCPT ); Sun, 2 Jan 2005 18:21:06 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261344AbVABXVG (ORCPT ); Sun, 2 Jan 2005 18:21:06 -0500 Received: from parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk ([195.92.249.252]:12217 "EHLO www.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261343AbVABXVE (ORCPT ); Sun, 2 Jan 2005 18:21:04 -0500 Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2005 23:21:02 +0000 From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" To: Adrian Bunk Cc: William Lee Irwin III , Andries Brouwer , Maciej Soltysiak , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: starting with 2.7 Message-ID: <20050102232102.GN26717@gallifrey> References: <1697129508.20050102210332@dns.toxicfilms.tv> <20050102203615.GL29332@holomorphy.com> <20050102212427.GG2818@pclin040.win.tue.nl> <20050102214211.GM29332@holomorphy.com> <20050102221534.GG4183@stusta.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050102221534.GG4183@stusta.de> X-Chocolate: 70 percent or better cocoa solids preferably X-Operating-System: Linux/2.6.5 (i686) X-Uptime: 23:08:07 up 8 days, 10:43, 1 user, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1560 Lines: 34 For me, as someone who very rarely actually changes any code in the kernel, I have always found the stable series useful for two reasons: 1) It encourages me to test the kernel; if I have a kernel that is generally thought to be stable then I will try it on my home machine and report problems - this lets the kernel get tested on a wide range of hardware and situations; if there is no kernel that is liable to be stable changes will get much less testing on a smaller range of hardware. 2) If I have a bug in a vendor kernel everyone just tells me to go and speak to the vendor - so at least having a stable base to go back to can let me report a bug that isn't due to any vendors patches. 3) In some cases the commercial vendors don't seem to release source to some of the kernels except to people who have bought the packages, so those vendor kernel fixes aren't 'publically' visible. I think (1) is very important - getting large numbers of people to test OSS is its greatest asset. Dave -----Open up your eyes, open up your mind, open up your code ------- / Dr. David Alan Gilbert | Running GNU/Linux on Alpha,68K| Happy \ \ gro.gilbert @ treblig.org | MIPS,x86,ARM,SPARC,PPC & HPPA | In Hex / \ _________________________|_____ http://www.treblig.org |_______/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/