DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references;
        b=UaLebdxo346FjYY/u7AeGpvOx/QiHhu3/GAN6Y43uk1ZNy8tvapIUy1dzLqea5vQZT5ZL7YssOutOWbT88ADBurvNRDYoiZ5HqjdRkdCK4pGpGpKwbWLS0ZJ7rbVUDidMh+mZlBRRj/EtxlPvUNSZj5Vdm4/RIzMzDlIUc7PeHU=
Message-ID: <799406d60501021649737f1bd@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2005 00:49:22 +0000
From: Adam Mercer <ramercer@gmail.com>
Reply-To: Adam Mercer <ramercer@gmail.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: starting with 2.7
In-Reply-To: <20050103003857.GJ4183@stusta.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <1697129508.20050102210332@dns.toxicfilms.tv>
	 <20050102203615.GL29332@holomorphy.com>
	 <20050102212427.GG2818@pclin040.win.tue.nl>
	 <20050102214211.GM29332@holomorphy.com>
	 <20050102221534.GG4183@stusta.de>
	 <20050103001917.GO29332@holomorphy.com>
	 <20050103003857.GJ4183@stusta.de>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 573
Lines: 18

On Mon, 3 Jan 2005 01:38:58 +0100, Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de> wrote:

> 2.4.27 -> 2.4.28 is a kernel upgrade that is very unlikely to cause
> problems.
> 
> Compared to this, 2.6.9 -> 2.6.10 is much more likely to break an
> existing setup that worked in 2.6.9 .

IIRC 2.4.9 -> 2.4.10 broke a few setups as well.

Cheers

Adam
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/