Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262290AbVADGgc (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Jan 2005 01:36:32 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262292AbVADGgc (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Jan 2005 01:36:32 -0500 Received: from parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk ([195.92.249.252]:54665 "EHLO www.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262290AbVADGgZ (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Jan 2005 01:36:25 -0500 Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2005 06:36:22 +0000 From: Al Viro To: Willy Tarreau Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Felipe Alfaro Solana , Rik van Riel , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Horst von Brand , Adrian Bunk , William Lee Irwin III , Maciej Soltysiak , Andries Brouwer , William Lee Irwin III Subject: Re: starting with 2.7 Message-ID: <20050104063622.GB26051@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> References: <200501032059.j03KxOEB004666@laptop11.inf.utfsm.cl> <0F9DCB4E-5DD1-11D9-892B-000D9352858E@mac.com> <5B2E0ED4-5DD3-11D9-892B-000D9352858E@mac.com> <20050103221441.GA26732@infradead.org> <20050104054649.GC7048@alpha.home.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050104054649.GC7048@alpha.home.local> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1391 Lines: 28 On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 06:46:49AM +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote: > On Mon, Jan 03, 2005 at 10:14:42PM +0000, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > > Gosh! I bought an ATI video card, I bought a VMware license, etc.... I > > > want to keep using them. Changing a "stable" kernel will continuously > > > annoy users and vendors. > > > > So buy some Operating System that supports the propritary software of > > your choice but stop annoying us. > > That's what he did. But it was not written in the notice that it could stop > working at any time :-) Do you want a long list of message-IDs going way, way back? Ones of Linus' postings saying that there never had been any promise whatsoever of in-kernel interfaces staying unchanged... For fsck sake, people, give it a rest already. 3rd-party kernel modules are and had always been responsibility of their maintainers, regardless of licensing, commercial status, etc. Exported functions and data structures can and do change; doing out-of-tree development means taking a calculated risk and being ready to follow these changes. So yes, it *had* been written. Many times. In details. With feeling. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/