Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261578AbVADJ0S (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Jan 2005 04:26:18 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261579AbVADJ0S (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Jan 2005 04:26:18 -0500 Received: from [213.146.154.40] ([213.146.154.40]:45448 "EHLO pentafluge.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261578AbVADJ0N (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Jan 2005 04:26:13 -0500 Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2005 09:26:12 +0000 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Ingo Molnar Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.6.10-mm1 Message-ID: <20050104092612.GA2371@infradead.org> Mail-Followup-To: Christoph Hellwig , Ingo Molnar , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20050103011113.6f6c8f44.akpm@osdl.org> <20050103115120.GB18408@infradead.org> <20050104090408.GA12197@elte.hu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050104090408.GA12197@elte.hu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by pentafluge.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 660 Lines: 18 On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 10:04:08AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > or is it the addition of _smp_processor_id() as a way to signal 'this > smp_processor_id() call in a preemptible region is fine, trust me'? Yes. > We > could do smp_processor_id_preempt() or some other name - any better > suggestions? I'd just kill the debug check and rely on the eye of the review to not let new users of smp_processor_id slip in. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/