Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261725AbVADRA6 (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Jan 2005 12:00:58 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261709AbVADRA5 (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Jan 2005 12:00:57 -0500 Received: from parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk ([195.92.249.252]:48332 "EHLO www.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261725AbVADRAk (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Jan 2005 12:00:40 -0500 Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2005 12:31:27 -0200 From: Marcelo Tosatti To: Till Kamppeter Cc: Rene Rebe , George Garvey , sane-devel , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, oliver@neukum.org, torvalds@osdl.org Subject: Re: Please remove hpusbscsi Was: [sane-devel] HP 7450C, hpusbscsi, permissions in Fedora Core 3 Message-ID: <20050104143127.GA7399@logos.cnet> References: <1104646290.5821.99.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20050102101258.GB8385@inxservices.com> <41D999CD.80105@exactcode.de> <41DAD6DA.70205@gmx.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <41DAD6DA.70205@gmx.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1611 Lines: 52 I would rather prefer leaving it in the tree marked as broken than completly removing the source, for 2.4 at least? On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 06:48:10PM +0100, Till Kamppeter wrote: > I have reported this to our Mandrakesoft kernel guys, so next > Mandrakelinux version (10.2) should not have this problem any more. > > http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=12891 > > For now, simply remove or rename the module on your system. > Till > > > Rene Rebe wrote: > >Hi, > > > >we should remove hpusbscsi from the Kernel. It is long obsolete and very > >unstable. I can send a patch for 2.4 and 2.6 (if needed) ;-) > > > >George Garvey wrote: > > > >>On Sat, Jan 01, 2005 at 10:11:30PM -0800, Thomas Frayne wrote: > > > > > >... > > > >> As far as I know, Rene has made it pretty clear he doesn't want to > >>use hpusbscsi with the avision driver. He prefers libusb. > > > > > >Yes. Hpusbscsi has many drawbacks. The major ones are: > > > > - does not work with new scanners (that are designed for USB 2.0) > > - it is highly instable (e.g. during an i/o error it locks up > > quite easily and leaves the (usb sub-)system in a state that > > needs a reboot ... > > > >The later problem made me add the user-space i/o code to the > >SANE/Avision backend, because I had to reboot my system every 5 minutes > >during development ... > > > >Yours, > > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/