Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261801AbVADS5c (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Jan 2005 13:57:32 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261799AbVADS5c (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Jan 2005 13:57:32 -0500 Received: from mustang.oldcity.dca.net ([216.158.38.3]:43428 "HELO mustang.oldcity.dca.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S261697AbVADS5R (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Jan 2005 13:57:17 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH] [request for inclusion] Realtime LSM From: Lee Revell To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , Ingo Molnar , "Jack O'Quin" In-Reply-To: <20050104182010.GA15254@infradead.org> References: <1104374603.9732.32.camel@krustophenia.net> <20050103140359.GA19976@infradead.org> <1104862614.8255.1.camel@krustophenia.net> <20050104182010.GA15254@infradead.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2005 13:57:13 -0500 Message-Id: <1104865034.8346.4.camel@krustophenia.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1376 Lines: 31 On Tue, 2005-01-04 at 18:20 +0000, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 01:16:54PM -0500, Lee Revell wrote: > > Got a patch? Code talks, BS walks. This is working perfectly, right > > now, and is being used by thousands of Linux ausio users. > > Which still doesn't mean it's the right design. And no, I don't need the > feature so I won't write it. If you want a certain feature it's up to > you to implement it in a way that's considered mergeable. > Please specify what's wrong with it. So far all your objection amounts to is "I don't like it". If you do have anything other that your opinion to back up your assertion that it's a bad design, you should have raised it months ago when this was first posted. Now that we have it to a mergeable state (as far as the people who worked on it are concerned), you want to pop up and say "Nope, bad design"? Sorry but last time I checked you were not the ultimate arbiter of good design on LKML. If you want to shitcan the _only known good, field tested, working solution_ then you have to have overwhelming technical arguments. So far I've seen zero. Lee - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/