Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261844AbVADTiB (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Jan 2005 14:38:01 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261842AbVADTfg (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Jan 2005 14:35:36 -0500 Received: from mail.tmr.com ([216.238.38.203]:6159 "EHLO gatekeeper.tmr.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261811AbVADTHo (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Jan 2005 14:07:44 -0500 Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2005 13:44:14 -0500 (EST) From: Bill Davidsen To: Rahul Karnik cc: Horst von Brand , Adrian Bunk , Diego Calleja , Willy Tarreau , wli@holomorphy.com, aebr@win.tue.nl, solt2@dns.toxicfilms.tv, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: starting with 2.7 In-Reply-To: <5b64f7f0501040931699220ad@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1941 Lines: 42 On Tue, 4 Jan 2005, Rahul Karnik wrote: > On Mon, 3 Jan 2005 18:42:24 -0500 (EST), Bill Davidsen wrote: > > On Mon, 3 Jan 2005, Horst von Brand wrote: > > > > APM vs. ACPI - shutdown doesn't reliably power down about half of the > > > > machines I use, and all five laptops have working suspend and non-working > > > > resume. APM seems to be pretty unsupported beyond "use ACPI for that." > > > > > > Many never machines just don't have APM. > > > > What's your point? I'm damn sure there are more machines with APM than 386 > > CPUs, AHA1540 SCSI controllers, or a lot of other supported stuff. Most > > machines which have APM at all have a functional power off capability, > > which is a desirable thing for most people. > > The point is not that the kernel should not support APM because it is > superceded by ACPI, but that your laptops do not support APM properly. > Did they work correctly with APM in 2.4? If so, we have a regression; > otherwise complain to the laptop vendor, they do not consider APM to > be a high enough priority. > The ThinkPad, Toshiba, and both Dells work correctly for both shutdown and suspend (via the apm -s) using 2.4. I haven't tried the ACER, it's new and started life with FC2 and a 2.6 kernel. It does power down correctly, and suspend, but doesn't resume so it's not very useful. I would complain with details, but the older laptops are now out of production, so I am not going to ask someone to divert time to making things work on them. The ACER is my current ride along, I would like to suspend that. -- bill davidsen CTO, TMR Associates, Inc Doing interesting things with little computers since 1979. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/