Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262555AbVAETAQ (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Jan 2005 14:00:16 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262556AbVAETAQ (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Jan 2005 14:00:16 -0500 Received: from holomorphy.com ([207.189.100.168]:43416 "EHLO holomorphy.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262555AbVAETAM (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Jan 2005 14:00:12 -0500 Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 10:56:37 -0800 From: William Lee Irwin III To: Bill Davidsen Cc: Willy Tarreau , Thomas Graf , "Theodore Ts'o" , Adrian Bunk , Diego Calleja , aebr@win.tue.nl, solt2@dns.toxicfilms.tv, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: starting with 2.7 Message-ID: <20050105185637.GE7961@holomorphy.com> References: <20050105000942.GA7961@holomorphy.com> <41DC324F.5040009@tmr.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <41DC324F.5040009@tmr.com> Organization: The Domain of Holomorphy User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040722i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 733 Lines: 19 William Lee Irwin III wrote: >> No one is claiming stability is not needed. We are only debating the >> best way to go about accomplishing it. On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 01:30:39PM -0500, Bill Davidsen wrote: > You fooled me, most of what I hear from developers sounds like "it's > working fine" to me. Linus made it this way, he wants it this way, and > if Alan Cox saying it isn't working well doesn't convince him, nothing > users say is going to matter. He did? Message-Id? -- wli - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/