Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262816AbVAFNGl (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Jan 2005 08:06:41 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262815AbVAFNGl (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Jan 2005 08:06:41 -0500 Received: from [213.146.154.40] ([213.146.154.40]:51877 "EHLO pentafluge.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262816AbVAFNGi (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Jan 2005 08:06:38 -0500 Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 13:06:33 +0000 From: Christoph Hellwig To: David Howells Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.6.10-mm1 Message-ID: <20050106130633.GA17229@infradead.org> Mail-Followup-To: Christoph Hellwig , David Howells , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20050106113216.GA16261@infradead.org> <20050103011113.6f6c8f44.akpm@osdl.org> <20050103100725.GA17856@infradead.org> <27229.1105016644@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <27229.1105016644@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by pentafluge.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 490 Lines: 11 On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 01:04:04PM +0000, David Howells wrote: > That's not right either. Filesystems really shouldn't be overloading the > vm_ops on memory mappings (as has been made clear to me) yes, they should. And various filesystems do. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/