Message-ID: <41DDA416.2010609@tmr.com>
Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 15:48:22 -0500
From: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20041217
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Paolo Ciarrocchi <paolo.ciarrocchi@gmail.com>
CC: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>, Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>,
       Diego Calleja <diegocg@teleline.es>, Willy Tarreau <willy@w.ods.org>,
       wli@holomorphy.com, aebr@win.tue.nl, solt2@dns.toxicfilms.tv,
       linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: starting with 2.7
References: <20050103183621.GA2885@thunk.org><20050103134727.GA2980@stusta.de> <4d8e3fd30501060603247e955a@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4d8e3fd30501060603247e955a@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1001
Lines: 28

Paolo Ciarrocchi wrote:

> What's wrong in keeping the release management as is now plus
> introducing a 2.6.X.Y series of kernels ?
> 
> In short:
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=109882220123966&w=2
> 
> Best,
> Paolo Ciarrocchi
> 
That's essentially what I said in <41DB2BF3.2010103@tmr.com>, and the 
only response I got questioned my mention that Alan Cox didn't think the 
process was working well. I suggested a fixed and shorter release 
schedule as well as point releases, but point releases are the more 
improtant, I believe.

I also said I didn't think it was going to change...

-- 
    -bill davidsen (davidsen@tmr.com)
"The secret to procrastination is to put things off until the
  last possible moment - but no longer"  -me
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/