Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263047AbVAFVin (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Jan 2005 16:38:43 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263039AbVAFVgy (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Jan 2005 16:36:54 -0500 Received: from mail.gadugi.org ([69.155.252.3]:8066 "EHLO mail.gadugi.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263001AbVAFVeY (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Jan 2005 16:34:24 -0500 Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 15:32:21 -0600 From: root To: Stephen Pollei Cc: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: OT Re: Cherokee Nation Posts Open Source Legisation Message-ID: <20050106213221.GA12866@mail.gadugi.org> References: <20050106180414.GA11597@mail.gadugi.org> <200501061836.j06IakHo030551@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> <20050106183725.GA12028@mail.gadugi.org> <200501061935.j06JZMq4013855@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> <1105043496.970.49.camel@fury> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1105043496.970.49.camel@fury> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1529 Lines: 33 > > proper means by, the public; and > Seems word-for-word the same. And I would think that an Free or Open > source licensed work that is published would be "generally known to" and > "readily ascertainable". > > > > You'll have a hard time convincing a jury not on the reservation that publishing > > something as open source is at all a "reasonable measure to keep it secret". > > If the license says the receipient of a piece of code must acknowledge and protect the trade secrets it contains, then it's enforceable. We trump state courts on the grounds of sovereinty, so a state court isn't able to reverse one of our courts unless there's a question of Federal Law. The Federal Courts can in vary narrow areas reverese our courts, but since this license represents a consentual commerical transaction with an Indian Nation, most folks will have to appeal to the US supreme court to get this reversed -- the Federal Courts are bound by the constitutional provisions regarding sovereignty. Makes Open Source code very easy to protect in state courts under existing Trade Secrete law, and yes, this is a modified version of the Uniform Trade Secrets Act. Please note the use of the word "individual" in the test. The comments from folks are very good an helpful. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/