Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261396AbVAGMzd (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Jan 2005 07:55:33 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261397AbVAGMzd (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Jan 2005 07:55:33 -0500 Received: from hermine.aitel.hist.no ([158.38.50.15]:57607 "HELO hermine.aitel.hist.no") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S261396AbVAGMz0 (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Jan 2005 07:55:26 -0500 Message-ID: <41DE88A2.6050004@hist.no> Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 14:03:30 +0100 From: Helge Hafting User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.9 (X11/20041124) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: root CC: Stephen Pollei , Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: OT Re: Cherokee Nation Posts Open Source Legisation References: <20050106180414.GA11597@mail.gadugi.org> <200501061836.j06IakHo030551@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> <20050106183725.GA12028@mail.gadugi.org> <200501061935.j06JZMq4013855@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> <1105043496.970.49.camel@fury> <20050106213221.GA12866@mail.gadugi.org> In-Reply-To: <20050106213221.GA12866@mail.gadugi.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1527 Lines: 41 root wrote: >>>proper means by, the public; and >>> >>> >>Seems word-for-word the same. And I would think that an Free or Open >>source licensed work that is published would be "generally known to" and >>"readily ascertainable". >> >> >>>You'll have a hard time convincing a jury not on the reservation that publishing >>>something as open source is at all a "reasonable measure to keep it secret". >>> >>> >>> > >If the license says the receipient of a piece of code must acknowledge >and protect the trade secrets it contains, then it's enforceable. > Sure, but if there is a secret that must be protected, then it isn't open source! By definition: open source is something I can give to absolutely anybody with no reservations. I.e. no need to protect anything. So your law means you can give someone code with the restriction that they protect the trade secret within, but such code is not open source. It may be less restrictive than many other commercial/proprietary licences, (i.e. you can give it away for free, for example) but it is not _open_ with such restrictions. The linux source for example, can be given to anybody with no reservations other than that the GPL is respected. (The GPL does not limit redistribution though.) Helge Hafting - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/