Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 29 Apr 2001 13:59:16 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 29 Apr 2001 13:59:07 -0400 Received: from leibniz.math.psu.edu ([146.186.130.2]:34947 "EHLO math.psu.edu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 29 Apr 2001 13:58:54 -0400 Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2001 13:58:52 -0400 (EDT) From: Alexander Viro To: Frank de Lange cc: Andrea Arcangeli , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Severe trashing in 2.4.4 In-Reply-To: <20010429194631.A11681@unternet.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 29 Apr 2001, Frank de Lange wrote: > On Sun, Apr 29, 2001 at 12:27:29PM -0400, Alexander Viro wrote: > > What about /proc/slabinfo? Notice that 2.4.4 (and couple of the 2.4.4-pre) > > has a bug in prune_icache() that makes it underestimate the amount of > > freeable inodes. > > Gotcha, wrt. slabinfo. Seems 2.4.4 (at least on my box) only knows how to > allocate skbuff_head_cache entries, not how to free them. Here's the last > /proc/slabinfo entry before I sysRQ'd the box: > skbuff_head_cache 341136 341136 160 14214 14214 1 : 252 126 > size-2048 66338 66338 2048 33169 33169 1 : 60 30 Hmm... I'd say that you also have a leak in kmalloc()'ed stuff - something in 1K--2K range. From your logs it looks like the thing never shrinks and grows prettu fast... - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/