Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261619AbVAGVEu (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Jan 2005 16:04:50 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261601AbVAGVDj (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Jan 2005 16:03:39 -0500 Received: from mail.tyan.com ([66.122.195.4]:33544 "EHLO tyanweb.tyan") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261603AbVAGVC5 (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Jan 2005 16:02:57 -0500 Message-ID: <3174569B9743D511922F00A0C94314230729132B@TYANWEB> From: YhLu To: Andi Kleen Cc: Matt Domsch , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, discuss@x86-64.org, jamesclv@us.ibm.com, suresh.b.siddha@intel.com Subject: RE: 256 apic id for amd64 Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 13:14:24 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 859 Lines: 25 After keep the bsp using 0, the jiffies works well. Werid? YH -----Original Message----- From: Andi Kleen [mailto:ak@muc.de] Sent: Friday, January 07, 2005 11:41 AM To: YhLu Cc: Matt Domsch; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; discuss@x86-64.org; jamesclv@us.ibm.com; suresh.b.siddha@intel.com Subject: Re: 256 apic id for amd64 On Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 11:43:52AM -0800, YhLu wrote: > Amd 8111 and 8131 only have 4 bit for apcid. So it only can use 0-15. How broken. Ok. But I still don't like your patch. You should give the BSP ID 0 and for the others it shouldn't matter anyways if they use high APICIDs. -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/