Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 7 Nov 2000 10:24:47 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 7 Nov 2000 10:24:37 -0500 Received: from [193.127.21.194] ([193.127.21.194]:29754 "HELO postal.sl.trymedia.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Tue, 7 Nov 2000 10:24:29 -0500 From: Abel Mu?oz Alcaraz To: "Linux Kernel" Subject: A question about memory fragmentation Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2000 16:20:20 +0100 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Importance: Normal Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi everybody, I have a question for you; How Linux avoids the memory fragmentation in linked lists? Windows 9x/NT/2000 (sorry, ;-)), have specific functions (like List_Create, ExInitializeSListHead, ...) to create generic linked lists but I don't find something similar in Linux. Has Linux a generic linked list management API ? Must I develop this? Is the kernel memory fragmentation a solved problem in Linux? (I wish it). I have develop my own API but I don't know if Linux can do this for me. Thanks in advance. Abel Mu?oz Alcaraz. Media Security Software Developer. mailto:abel@trymedia.com Trymedia Systems - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/