Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261780AbVAHEPa (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Jan 2005 23:15:30 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261783AbVAHEPa (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Jan 2005 23:15:30 -0500 Received: from holly.csn.ul.ie ([136.201.105.4]:4497 "EHLO holly.csn.ul.ie") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261780AbVAHEP0 (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Jan 2005 23:15:26 -0500 Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2005 04:15:24 +0000 (GMT) From: Dave Airlie X-X-Sender: airlied@skynet To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , torvalds@osdl.org Cc: jonsmirl@gmail.com Subject: lindenting the drm directory.. Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 815 Lines: 23 the DRM is in a bad way with respect to whitespace, I know people have objections to whitespace patches in bitkeeper, but after cleaning up all the code, I'd like to Lindent it all as well, the DRM macro removal touched every function in every file... as the DRM is developed in the CVS tree, and nearly all the blame annotation in bitkeeper blames me I don't think it is really a bad thing for the DRM... Objections? Dave. -- David Airlie, Software Engineer http://www.skynet.ie/~airlied / airlied at skynet.ie pam_smb / Linux DECstation / Linux VAX / ILUG person - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/