Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S133025AbRD3B2p>; Sun, 29 Apr 2001 21:28:45 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S136429AbRD3B2g>; Sun, 29 Apr 2001 21:28:36 -0400
Received: from [63.95.87.168] ([63.95.87.168]:61959 "HELO xi.linuxpower.cx")
	by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id <S133025AbRD3B22>;
	Sun, 29 Apr 2001 21:28:28 -0400
Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2001 21:28:27 -0400
From: Gregory Maxwell <greg@linuxpower.cx>
To: Andres Salomon <dilinger@mp3revolution.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: deregister?
Message-ID: <20010429212826.H17539@xi.linuxpower.cx>
In-Reply-To: <20010429211049.A17111@mp3revolution.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.8i
In-Reply-To: <20010429211049.A17111@mp3revolution.net>; from dilinger@mp3revolution.net on Sun, Apr 29, 2001 at 09:10:49PM -0400
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Sun, Apr 29, 2001 at 09:10:49PM -0400, Andres Salomon wrote:
[snip]
> Not to mention in various comments and documentation.  Deregister,
> according to www.m-w.com (and many other dictionaries), is not a word.
> Is there some sort of historical significance to this being used, in
> place of "unregister"?

I purpose that we fix this horrible spelling error right away and get it
into 2.4.5! :)

(up yours binary-only module authors! :) )
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/