Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262708AbVAKKyi (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Jan 2005 05:54:38 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262711AbVAKKxj (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Jan 2005 05:53:39 -0500 Received: from parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk ([195.92.249.252]:35977 "EHLO www.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262717AbVAKKxR (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Jan 2005 05:53:17 -0500 Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2005 05:49:49 -0200 From: Marcelo Tosatti To: Arjan van de Ven Cc: Badari Pulavarty , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] 2.4.19-rc1 stack reduction patches Message-ID: <20050111074949.GE18796@logos.cnet> References: <1105378550.4000.132.camel@dyn318077bld.beaverton.ibm.com> <1105429144.3917.0.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1105429144.3917.0.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 813 Lines: 19 On Tue, Jan 11, 2005 at 08:39:03AM +0100, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > On Mon, 2005-01-10 at 09:35 -0800, Badari Pulavarty wrote: > > Hi Marcelo, > > > > I re-worked all the applicable stack reduction patches for 2.4.19-rc1. > > is it really worth doing this sort of thing for 2.4 still? It's a matter > of risk versus gain... not sure this sort of thing is still worth it in > the deep-maintenance 2.4 tree Well it seems the s390 fellows are seeing stack overflows, which are serious enough. Have you noticed that? Moreover this are simple changes, not complex ones. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/