Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262571AbVAKUUL (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Jan 2005 15:20:11 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262577AbVAKUUL (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Jan 2005 15:20:11 -0500 Received: from zcars04e.nortelnetworks.com ([47.129.242.56]:21912 "EHLO zcars04e.nortelnetworks.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262571AbVAKUUB (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Jan 2005 15:20:01 -0500 Message-ID: <41E434B4.9020903@nortelnetworks.com> Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2005 14:19:00 -0600 X-Sybari-Space: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 From: Chris Friesen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040115 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Jack O'Quin" CC: Matt Mackall , Chris Wright , Christoph Hellwig , Andrew Morton , Lee Revell , paul@linuxaudiosystems.com, arjanv@redhat.com, mingo@elte.hu, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] [request for inclusion] Realtime LSM References: <200501071620.j07GKrIa018718@localhost.localdomain> <1105132348.20278.88.camel@krustophenia.net> <20050107134941.11cecbfc.akpm@osdl.org> <20050107221059.GA17392@infradead.org> <20050107142920.K2357@build.pdx.osdl.net> <87mzvkxxck.fsf@sulphur.joq.us> <20050110212019.GG2995@waste.org> <87d5wc9gx1.fsf@sulphur.joq.us> <20050111195010.GU2940@waste.org> <871xcr3fjc.fsf@sulphur.joq.us> In-Reply-To: <871xcr3fjc.fsf@sulphur.joq.us> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1219 Lines: 29 Jack O'Quin wrote: > Matt Mackall writes: >>Thankfully a buffer underrun is no more fatal for pro audio than a >>broken guitar string. CDs skip, DATs glitch, XLR cables flake out, >>circuit breakers trip, amps clip, Powerbooks crash, and the show goes >>on. I've done more than enough stage tech to know it's a huge pain in >>the ass, but let's stop pretending we require absolute perfection, >>please. > In _practice_, Ingo's patches are considerably better than what you > seem to consider "good enough for mere audio work". I don't see anywere that Matt was criticising Ingo's work. He just said that it wasn't hard realtime--which is true. A hard realtime system will *guarantee* that the deadlines will be met, *no matter what*. It makes all kinds of other sacrifices to do it, and it makes additional demands on the application designer as well. I don't think Ingo would claim that his patches make Linux a hard RT operating system. Chris - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/