Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262156AbVAKUrN (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Jan 2005 15:47:13 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262161AbVAKUrN (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Jan 2005 15:47:13 -0500 Received: from fw.osdl.org ([65.172.181.6]:4576 "EHLO mail.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262156AbVAKUrI (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Jan 2005 15:47:08 -0500 Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2005 12:47:07 -0800 From: Chris Wright To: Lee Revell Cc: Matt Mackall , "Jack O'Quin" , Chris Wright , Christoph Hellwig , Andrew Morton , paul@linuxaudiosystems.com, arjanv@redhat.com, mingo@elte.hu, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] [request for inclusion] Realtime LSM Message-ID: <20050111124707.J10567@build.pdx.osdl.net> References: <20050107134941.11cecbfc.akpm@osdl.org> <20050107221059.GA17392@infradead.org> <20050107142920.K2357@build.pdx.osdl.net> <87mzvkxxck.fsf@sulphur.joq.us> <20050110212019.GG2995@waste.org> <87d5wc9gx1.fsf@sulphur.joq.us> <20050111195010.GU2940@waste.org> <871xcr3fjc.fsf@sulphur.joq.us> <20050111200549.GW2940@waste.org> <1105475349.4295.21.camel@krustophenia.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <1105475349.4295.21.camel@krustophenia.net>; from rlrevell@joe-job.com on Tue, Jan 11, 2005 at 03:29:09PM -0500 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1106 Lines: 26 * Lee Revell (rlrevell@joe-job.com) wrote: > On Tue, 2005-01-11 at 12:05 -0800, Matt Mackall wrote: > > Anyway, *plonk*. > > Plonk? WTF? Jack comes up with what many people think is a reasonable > solution to a real problem, that affects thousands of users, and in the > middle of what seems to me a civilized discussion, you killfile him > because he disagrees with you? > > Plonk to you too, asshole. Guys, could we please bring this back to a useful discussion. None of you have commented on whether the rlimits for priority are useful. As I said before, I've no real problem with the module as it stands since it's tiny, quite contained, and does something people need. But I agree it'd be better to find something that's workable as long term solution. thanks, -chris -- Linux Security Modules http://lsm.immunix.org http://lsm.bkbits.net - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/