Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262829AbVAKVb5 (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Jan 2005 16:31:57 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262877AbVAKV3P (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Jan 2005 16:29:15 -0500 Received: from mx2.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:47299 "EHLO mx2.elte.hu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262829AbVAKV1g (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Jan 2005 16:27:36 -0500 Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2005 22:27:19 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar To: Chris Wright Cc: Matt Mackall , Paul Davis , "Jack O'Quin" , Christoph Hellwig , Andrew Morton , Lee Revell , arjanv@redhat.com, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] [request for inclusion] Realtime LSM Message-ID: <20050111212719.GA23477@elte.hu> References: <20050110212019.GG2995@waste.org> <200501111305.j0BD58U2000483@localhost.localdomain> <20050111191701.GT2940@waste.org> <20050111125008.K10567@build.pdx.osdl.net> <20050111205809.GB21308@elte.hu> <20050111131400.L10567@build.pdx.osdl.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050111131400.L10567@build.pdx.osdl.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-ELTE-SpamVersion: MailScanner 4.31.6-itk1 (ELTE 1.2) SpamAssassin 2.63 ClamAV 0.73 X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-4.9, required 5.9, autolearn=not spam, BAYES_00 -4.90 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamScore: -4 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1241 Lines: 36 * Chris Wright wrote: > Hmm, I wonder if this could have anything to do with it. These are > within striking range: > > PID COMMAND NI PRI > 9 events/1 -10 34 > 931 kcryptd/1 -10 33 > 930 kcryptd/0 -10 34 > 8 events/0 -10 34 > 892 ata/1 -10 34 > 891 ata/0 -10 34 > 3747 udevd -10 33 > 26 kacpid -10 31 > 238 aio/1 -10 34 > 237 aio/0 -10 31 > 117 kblockd/1 -10 34 > 116 kblockd/0 -10 34 > 10 khelper -10 34 you are right, i forgot about kernel threads. If they are nice -10 on Jack's system too then they are within striking range indeed, especially since they are typically idle and if then they are active for short bursts of time and get the maximum boost. Jack, could you renice these to -5, to make sure they dont interfere? btw., why are these at nice -10? workqueue.c sets nice value to -5 normally. Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/