Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262959AbVALANf (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Jan 2005 19:13:35 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262977AbVALAJe (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Jan 2005 19:09:34 -0500 Received: from fw.osdl.org ([65.172.181.6]:3226 "EHLO mail.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262960AbVALAHV (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Jan 2005 19:07:21 -0500 Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2005 16:07:09 -0800 (PST) From: Linus Torvalds To: Russell King cc: Andrew Morton , Linux Kernel List Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: flush_cache_page() In-Reply-To: <20050111223652.D30946@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> Message-ID: References: <20050111223652.D30946@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 621 Lines: 17 On Tue, 11 Jan 2005, Russell King wrote: > > Any responses on this? Didn't get any last time I mailed this out. I don't have any real objections. I'd like it verified that gcc can compile away all the overhead on the architectures that don't use the pfn, since "page_to_pfn()" can be a bit expensive otherwise.. But I don't see anything wrong with the approach. Linus - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/