Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261210AbVALQXV (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Jan 2005 11:23:21 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261229AbVALQXV (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Jan 2005 11:23:21 -0500 Received: from mrdec-exch.amrdec.army.mil ([199.209.144.25]:42767 "EHLO mrdec-owa.ds.amrdec.army.mil") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261210AbVALQXT (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Jan 2005 11:23:19 -0500 Message-ID: From: "Reynolds, Terry (Contractor-SIMTECH)" To: "Linux-Kernel@Vger. Kernel. Org (linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org)" Subject: Realtime-preemtp-2.6.10...-01 on a ppc64? Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2005 10:13:37 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72) Content-Type: text/plain Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 863 Lines: 28 Hi all, I've installed the patches on 2.6.10 (2.6.10-mm1 & realtime-preempt-2.6.10 ... .34-01) on my G5 desktop. The realtime patched kernel wont compile, as it has a large number of re-defined & conflicting types. Including: spinlock_t rwlock_t SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED RW_LOCK_UNLOCKED and lots of _raw_.*lock types. It seems the ppc64 architecture hasn't been fleshed out yet for the real-time preemption patches, or did I just do something moronic? I'm sitting in front of a couple of G5 desktops and I'd like to help test / checkout / work on this branch! TIA. Terry Reynolds Simulation Technologies, INC. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/