Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261209AbVALSmN (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Jan 2005 13:42:13 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261224AbVALSmN (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Jan 2005 13:42:13 -0500 Received: from e5.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.145]:5338 "EHLO e5.ny.us.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261209AbVALSmG (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Jan 2005 13:42:06 -0500 Subject: Re: node_online_map patch kills x86_64 From: Matthew Dobson Reply-To: colpatch@us.ibm.com To: Chris Wright Cc: William Lee Irwin III , LKML In-Reply-To: <20050111163504.D24171@build.pdx.osdl.net> References: <20050111151656.A24171@build.pdx.osdl.net> <20050112000726.GD14443@holomorphy.com> <20050111163504.D24171@build.pdx.osdl.net> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: IBM LTC Message-Id: <1105555323.8266.2.camel@arrakis> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 (1.4.5-7) Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2005 10:42:03 -0800 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1429 Lines: 33 On Tue, 2005-01-11 at 16:35, Chris Wright wrote: > * William Lee Irwin III (wli@holomorphy.com) wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 11, 2005 at 03:16:56PM -0800, Chris Wright wrote: > > > Backing out the x86_64 specific bits of the numnodes -> node_online_map > > > patch and the generic bits from wli, kills my machine at boot. > > > It hits the early_idt_handler and dies straight away. What would help > > > to debug this thing? > > > > The only part of this I'm responsible for is converting build_zonelists() > > to pass its nodemask argument by reference to address a livelock. I feel > > your pain and if not otherwise occupied I would help fix your problem > > right away. > > Thanks wli. Seems Andi understands the issue despite my unintelligible > bug report ;-) > > thanks, > -chris So I assume you were trying to saying that backing out the patches makes the machine boot, and leaving them in kills it, right? And does Andi's "[PATCH] x86_64: Optimize nodemask operations slightly" fix your problem? I'm assuming that's what the reference to "Andi understanding the issue" meant? Or is there still a problem booting x86_64 with the numnodes -> node_online_map patches? -Matt - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/