Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261391AbVALVT5 (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Jan 2005 16:19:57 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261457AbVALVN7 (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Jan 2005 16:13:59 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:44010 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261463AbVALVKj (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Jan 2005 16:10:39 -0500 Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2005 16:09:45 -0500 From: Dave Jones To: Roland Dreier Cc: greg@kroah.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, openib-general@openib.org Subject: Re: debugfs directory structure Message-ID: <20050112210945.GN24518@redhat.com> Mail-Followup-To: Dave Jones , Roland Dreier , greg@kroah.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, openib-general@openib.org References: <52d5watlqs.fsf@topspin.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <52d5watlqs.fsf@topspin.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 869 Lines: 23 On Wed, Jan 12, 2005 at 12:50:51PM -0800, Roland Dreier wrote: > Hi Greg, > > Now that debugfs is merged into Linus's tree, I'm looking at using it > to replace the IPoIB debugging pseudo-filesystem (ipoib_debugfs). Is > there any guidance on what the structure of debugfs should look like? > Right now I'm planning on putting all the debug info files under an > ipoib/ top level directory. Does that sound reasonable? How about mirroring the toplevel kernel source structure ? Ie, you'd make drivers/infiniband/ulp/ipoib ? It could get ugly quickly without some structure at least to the toplevel dir. Dave - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/