Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261459AbVALVdO (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Jan 2005 16:33:14 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261276AbVALV3v (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Jan 2005 16:29:51 -0500 Received: from mail.kroah.org ([69.55.234.183]:60615 "EHLO perch.kroah.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261459AbVALV1W (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Jan 2005 16:27:22 -0500 Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2005 13:27:16 -0800 From: Greg KH To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Chris Wright , akpm@osdl.org, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, marcelo.tosatti@cyclades.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: thoughts on kernel security issues Message-ID: <20050112212716.GA13531@kroah.com> References: <20050112094807.K24171@build.pdx.osdl.net> <20050112104407.N24171@build.pdx.osdl.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 737 Lines: 20 On Wed, Jan 12, 2005 at 10:57:25AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Wed, 12 Jan 2005, Chris Wright wrote: > > Opinions on where to set it up? vger, osdl, ...? > > I don't personally think it matters. Especially if we make it very clear > that it's purely technical, and no vendor politics can enter into it. I think vger fits that bill, if for no other reason than to keep the "osdl is taking over the kernel" rumors at bay :) That is, if the vger postmasters agree. thanks, greg k-h - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/