Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261577AbVALXmg (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Jan 2005 18:42:36 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261596AbVALXmY (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Jan 2005 18:42:24 -0500 Received: from jive.SoftHome.net ([66.54.152.27]:53483 "HELO jive.SoftHome.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S261577AbVALXjF (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Jan 2005 18:39:05 -0500 Subject: PCI lost interrupts and PLX chips From: Dimitris Lampridis To: Linux Kernel Message-Id: <1105573129.3218.11.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 01:38:49 +0200 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1157 Lines: 27 Hi everybody, I noticed a conversation some days ago that also mentioned something about PLX chips and a certain problem resulting in loss of interrupt signals. I'm writing a driver for a PCI-based device (an embedded USB Host Controller) and it uses a PLX bridge (device ID 5406). Although I've set up the device correctly and a logical analyzer shows the interrupts being generated on the USB HC chip, nothing comes past the bridge, thus nothing reaches the system. I use a typical pci_enable_device() followed but some request_region() and of course request_irq() on a kernel 2.6.10-rc3 (i386 system, VIA KT133, no APIC...) Does this have something to do with the discussion about PLX chips mentioned above? If it does, can anybody make clear what I have to do to see those interrupts coming? You can find the mail in question at: http://seclists.org/lists/linux-kernel/2005/Jan/0792.html Thanks, Dimitris - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/