Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261288AbVAMBw5 (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Jan 2005 20:52:57 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261433AbVAMBwW (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Jan 2005 20:52:22 -0500 Received: from mail.kroah.org ([69.55.234.183]:60605 "EHLO perch.kroah.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261357AbVALVBh (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Jan 2005 16:01:37 -0500 Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2005 13:01:36 -0800 From: Greg KH To: Roland Dreier Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, openib-general@openib.org Subject: Re: debugfs directory structure Message-ID: <20050112210136.GC12319@kroah.com> References: <52d5watlqs.fsf@topspin.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <52d5watlqs.fsf@topspin.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 946 Lines: 27 On Wed, Jan 12, 2005 at 12:50:51PM -0800, Roland Dreier wrote: > Hi Greg, > > Now that debugfs is merged into Linus's tree, I'm looking at using it > to replace the IPoIB debugging pseudo-filesystem (ipoib_debugfs). Great! > Is > there any guidance on what the structure of debugfs should look like? > Right now I'm planning on putting all the debug info files under an > ipoib/ top level directory. Does that sound reasonable? Anarchy rules in debugfs. Do what you want. If you stomp over someone else's stuff, I expect complaints and maybe someone will have to arbitrate, but odds are that will ever happen is pretty slim. So yes, ipoib/ in the top level sounds just fine. thanks, greg k-h - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/