Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261324AbVAMJp3 (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Jan 2005 04:45:29 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261513AbVAMJp3 (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Jan 2005 04:45:29 -0500 Received: from ookhoi.xs4all.nl ([213.84.114.66]:2741 "EHLO favonius.humilis.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261324AbVAMJpW (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Jan 2005 04:45:22 -0500 Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 10:45:37 +0100 From: Sander To: Kernel Mailing List Cc: "Sergey S. Kostyliov" Subject: NUMA or not on dual Opteron (was: Re: Linux 2.6.11-rc1) Message-ID: <20050113094537.GB2547@favonius> Reply-To: sander@humilis.net References: <200501121824.44327.rathamahata@ehouse.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Uptime: 09:57:10 up 3 days, 11:30, 26 users, load average: 1.02, 1.01, 1.00 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 951 Lines: 26 Linus Torvalds wrote (ao): > On Wed, 12 Jan 2005, Sergey S. Kostyliov wrote: > > 2.6.10-rc1 hangs at boot stage for my dual opteron machine > > Oops, yes. There's some recent NUMA breakage - either disable > CONFIG_NUMA, or apply the patches that Andi Kleen just posted on the > mailing list (the second option much preferred, just to verify that > yes, that does fix it). I was under the impression that NUMA is useful on > 2-way systems only. Is this true, and if not, under what circumstances is NUMA useful on 2-way Opteron systems? In other words: why should one want NUMA to be enabled or disabled for dual Opteron? Thanks in advance. -- Humilis IT Services and Solutions http://www.humilis.net - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/