Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261677AbVAMPqP (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Jan 2005 10:46:15 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261686AbVAMPmw (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Jan 2005 10:42:52 -0500 Received: from parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk ([195.92.249.252]:24279 "EHLO www.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261649AbVAMPhX (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Jan 2005 10:37:23 -0500 Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 10:09:00 -0200 From: Marcelo Tosatti To: Scott Doty Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, davem@redhat.com, Herbert Xu Subject: Re: 2.4.28(+?): Strange ARP problem Message-ID: <20050113120900.GA5681@logos.cnet> References: <20050113145029.GA22622@sonic.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050113145029.GA22622@sonic.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1621 Lines: 41 On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 06:50:29AM -0800, Scott Doty wrote: > Hi, > > We use Linux extensively here at Sonic.net. Our web servers have two > NIC's -- a NIC with a public IP address, and a NIC on our SAN (with NetApps). > > When we tried to upgrade to 2.4.28, we encountered a problem with NetApp > reachability, which turns out to have been a problem with ARP: we > were seeing two ARP entries for the NetApp IP's. One would be correct, and > one would be "incomplete". > > Occasionally, a system would glom onto the incomplete entry, and NFS > connectivity would tank. This doesn't happen with 2.4.27. > > We'd like to upgrade to 2.4.29-rc2, but we have much trepidation about doing > so. I certainly don't want to treat the list as "our own personal help > desk" (as warned about in the FAQ), but was hoping someone could shed some > light on the problem. I think either myself or one of our guys can write a > patch to fix it, if someone would point us in the right direction. > > Thank you, Scott, I have no idea of what might be causing such regression - I see a few ARP related changelogs on v2.4.28-rc2: o [IPV4]: Set ARP hw type correctly for BOOTP over FDDI o [IPV4]: Permit the official ARP hw type in SIOCSARP for FDDI Maybe you can try earlier v2.4.28's (-rc1 for one) to check where the problem starts to happen? David, Herbert, any ideas? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/