Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261676AbVAMQUJ (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Jan 2005 11:20:09 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261671AbVAMQUI (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Jan 2005 11:20:08 -0500 Received: from mail.tv-sign.ru ([213.234.233.51]:58584 "EHLO several.ru") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261676AbVAMQSg (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Jan 2005 11:18:36 -0500 Message-ID: <41E6AE31.5812BAF9@tv-sign.ru> Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 20:21:53 +0300 From: Oleg Nesterov X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.20 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Q: shrink_cache() vs release_pages() Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 782 Lines: 32 Hello. shrink_cache: if (get_page_testone(page)) { __put_page(page); SetPageLRU(page); list_add(&page->lru, &zone->inactive_list); continue; } Is it really necessary to re-add the page to inactive_list? It seems to me that shrink_cache() can just do: if (get_page_testone(page)) { __put_page(page); --zone->nr_inactive; continue; } When the __page_cache_release (or whatever) takes zone->lru_lock it must check PG_lru before del_page_from_lru(). The same question applies to refill_inactive_zone(). Thanks, Oleg. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/