Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261225AbVAMQo1 (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Jan 2005 11:44:27 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261233AbVAMQnC (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Jan 2005 11:43:02 -0500 Received: from clock-tower.bc.nu ([81.2.110.250]:29156 "EHLO localhost.localdomain") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261225AbVAMQlC (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Jan 2005 11:41:02 -0500 Subject: Re: Kernel releases for security updates From: Alan Cox To: Gregory Boyce Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <1105629033.4664.39.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 (1.4.6-2) Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 15:36:44 +0000 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 852 Lines: 19 On Mer, 2005-01-12 at 19:45, Gregory Boyce wrote: > be very interested in being able to run a kernel for extended lengths of > time, but most of the discussion on point releases has been about getting > a 2.6.X.1 while 2.6.X+1 is still in it's pre stages. What about the > people running 2.6.X-1? Can they expect to get a point release for > security updates? For -ac I'll support just the current release unless there are real stability problems or a hole occurs just as Linus puts out a new release and there isn't enough test data to see what needs fixing in it in which case I'll fix both. Alan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/