Message-Id: <200501140351.j0E3pdpe027121@localhost.localdomain>
To: Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>
cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au, lkml@s2y4n2c.de,
       rlrevell@joe-job.com, arjanv@redhat.com, joq@io.com, chrisw@osdl.org,
       mpm@selenic.com, hch@infradead.org, mingo@elte.hu,
       alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [request for inclusion] Realtime LSM 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 14 Jan 2005 14:38:00 +1100."
             <41E73E98.8070603@kolivas.org> 
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 22:51:39 -0500
From: Paul Davis <paul@linuxaudiosystems.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 964
Lines: 21

>> its a fine answer, but its the answer to a slightly different
>> question. if anyone (maybe us audio freaks, maybe someone else) comes
>> up with a reason to want "The Real SCHED_FIFO", the original question
>> will have gone unanswered.
>
>Ah then  you missed something. You can set the max cpu of SCHED_ISO to 
>100% and then you have it.

true, i missed that :) but i also recall you saying you were thinking
of having no prioritization within SCHED_ISO ... or am i remembering
wrong? also, is it just me, or having to ways to achieve the exact
same result seems very un-linux-like ... and if they are not exact
same results, how does a regular user get the SCHED_FIFO ones? is the
answer just "they don't" ?

--p
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/