Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262001AbVANOnA (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Jan 2005 09:43:00 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262002AbVANOnA (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Jan 2005 09:43:00 -0500 Received: from mail.interware.hu ([195.70.32.130]:3025 "EHLO mail.interware.hu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262001AbVANOmg (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Jan 2005 09:42:36 -0500 Subject: sparc64 memory size anomaly From: Hirling Endre To: lkml Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 15:42:44 +0100 Message-Id: <1105713764.23663.69.camel@dusk.interware.hu> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 740 Lines: 20 Hello, I installed Linux (kernel 2.6.9/2.6.10, Debian Sid) on a Sun Fire v240 with 2 CPUs and 2G of RAM. If the memory modules are arranged according to the manual (two modules for each cpu), Linux sees only 1.6G of the memory. If I put all four memory modules beside one CPU, Linux sees all two gigs. Under solaris there's no missing memory in either case. Apart from this, Linux seems to work well on the machine. Has anyone seen (or, more preferably, solved) this before? greetings endre - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/