Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262117AbVANUtW (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Jan 2005 15:49:22 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262089AbVANUtW (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Jan 2005 15:49:22 -0500 Received: from filer.fsl.cs.sunysb.edu ([130.245.126.2]:22987 "EHLO filer.fsl.cs.sunysb.edu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262117AbVANUtN (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Jan 2005 15:49:13 -0500 Subject: Adding a new system call from a module in 2.6 From: Avishay Traeger To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 15:49:20 -0500 Message-Id: <1105735760.3253.23.camel@avishay.fsl.cs.sunysb.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.0-1mdk Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 729 Lines: 16 Now that the sys_call_table is no longer exported, what would be the best way to add a new system call from a module in 2.6? I have only seen the system call table in assembly code (such as in arch/i386/kernel/entry.S) and do not know how to export it. I know that doing this is not recommended, but it would save me a lot of time while developing new system calls (no need to recompile kernel and reboot for every change). Thanks in advance for any suggestions. Avishay Traeger - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/